The fallout from the Green Bay Packers’ controversial 34–26 loss to the Denver Broncos has intensified after Packers CEO Ed Policy reportedly submitted a substantial evidence package to the NFL, raising concerns about officiating decisions during the game.

According to multiple reports, Policy has sent what was described as a 10GB digital file to league officials, containing video clips, play-by-play breakdowns, officiating comparisons, and analytical data that the Packers believe demonstrate potential officiating bias throughout the matchup. The submission was made through formal league channels, requesting an official review.

At this stage, the NFL has not confirmed the contents of the materials, nor has it announced whether a formal investigation will be launched.

In a brief statement, Policy emphasized that the organization’s actions were not driven by emotion, but by responsibility.

“This submission is about accountability and transparency,” Policy said. “We owe it to our players, coaches, and fans to ensure that games are officiated fairly and consistently.”

The 26–34 game has remained under scrutiny since its conclusion, with several late-game calls — and non-calls — drawing criticism from Packers players, coaches, and fans. While officiating decisions are a routine part of postgame debate across the league, the scale of Green Bay’s submission signals an unusually serious escalation.

Sources familiar with the matter say the evidence package allegedly includes:

• Multiple replay angles of disputed penalties

• Comparative officiating trends across similar games

• Timing analysis of key calls affecting momentum

• Internal third-party analytics assessments

However, none of these claims have been independently verified.

NFL rules allow teams to submit officiating concerns for review, though such reviews rarely result in public discipline or retroactive changes to game outcomes. League officials traditionally maintain that human error is part of the game, while stressing consistency as the guiding standard.

So far, the NFL has issued no public comment beyond acknowledging receipt of the submission.

Reaction across the league has been swift and divided.

Some former players and analysts praised the Packers for formally documenting their concerns rather than relying on emotional public criticism. Others warned that escalating disputes over officiating risk undermining confidence in the league if not handled carefully.

“This is a delicate line,” one former NFL executive said. “Teams have every right to ask questions. But the league must protect the integrity of its officials while addressing legitimate concerns.”

On social media, Packers fans rallied behind Policy’s decision, viewing the submission as a long-overdue stand against what they believe was an unevenly officiated contest. Broncos fans, meanwhile, pushed back strongly, arguing that Denver earned the win through execution and discipline rather than officiating assistance.

Inside the Broncos organization, no official response has been made. Players and coaches have largely avoided the controversy, emphasizing preparation, performance, and moving forward.

League observers note that even if no formal investigation is announced, submissions of this magnitude can influence internal officiating evaluations, future crew assignments, and rule clarification memos distributed to teams.

For the Packers, the move reflects broader frustration following a loss that many within the organization believe changed the trajectory of the game at critical moments.

“We can’t change the result,” one team source said. “But we can make sure our concerns are heard.”

As the NFL reviews the submission, the league faces renewed pressure to balance transparency with trust — both in its officiating crews and in the competitive fairness of the game.

Whether Ed Policy’s evidence leads to formal action remains uncertain. What is clear, however, is that the controversy surrounding the Broncos–Packers matchup has not faded with the final whistle.

Instead, it has entered a new phase — one that will test the NFL’s ability to respond decisively while protecting the credibility of the sport itself.